Recommended

Justin Welby rebuked over actions in case of chaplain deemed terror threat for questioning LGBT ideology

The Rev. Bernard Randall
The Rev. Bernard Randall | Christian Legal Centre

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, is being criticized for his handling of a case involving Bernard Randall, a chaplain blacklisted for a sermon questioning LGBT teachings at a Christian school. A leading legal figure within the Church of England described Welby’s refusal to address the concerns as “plainly wrong.”

Randall, 52, previously a chaplain at Trent College in Nottingham, was barred from preaching for five years following a 2019 sermon in which he encouraged students to debate LGBT teachings after they asked for his guidance on the issue. Despite being cleared by multiple secular bodies, Randall’s license to preach was withheld by the Bishop of Derby, Libby Lane, citing safeguarding concerns.

The decision remains in effect even though Randall was found not to have violated CofE doctrine.

Get Our Latest News for FREE

Subscribe to get daily/weekly email with the top stories (plus special offers!) from The Christian Post. Be the first to know.

Gregory Jones K.C., tasked with reviewing the clergy discipline tribunal’s findings, criticized the CofE’s handling of Randall's case, calling the error “gross” and the situation “egregious,” The Telegraph noted.

Jones noted that the CofE had failed to justify the safeguarding concerns adequately, suggesting a lack of substantial evidence against Randall. Despite these findings, Welby has blocked Randall from filing a misconduct case against Bishop Lane.

In a sermon that sparked controversy, Randall, who had previously served as a university chaplain at Cambridge, promoted a dialogue on biological sex and conscience rights within a Christian educational context. He argued for a “balanced debate” on such issues, a stance that ultimately led to his job loss and subsequent blacklisting, including being investigated as a terrorist.

The case has escalated to the point where Randall is pursuing a judicial review against Dame Sarah Asplin’s decision to dismiss his grievances. Dame Sarah, president of Tribunals, had acknowledged “serious errors” in the handling of the case but did not hold Bishop Lane personally accountable, instead suggesting a reevaluation of the case by an independent team.

Amid the legal and ecclesiastical battles, Randall voiced his frustration over the CofE’s reluctance to support him, despite shared theological stances. Speaking to the Telegraph, he described the use of safeguarding protocols as a “political tool” against him, undermining his career and personal life.

Andrea Williams, CEO of the Christian Legal Centre and supporter of Randall’s case, has also criticized the CofE’s stance as contradictory to its teachings. She pointed out the paradox of the Protestant denomination's actions, suggesting that even historical figures like Jesus would struggle under the current doctrines of safeguarding applied by the CofE.

The Disclosure and Barring Service and other regulatory bodies have dismissed actions against Randall, contradicting the CofE Diocese of Derby’s stance, which labeled the denomination’s own teachings as a “risk factor.” This stance has led to Randall being unable to officiate in church services.

“I have been vindicated by a number of secular bodies, but the CofE, who, on paper, share my beliefs and should be supporting me, are refusing to give me my life back,” Randall was quoted as saying.

Was this article helpful?

Help keep The Christian Post free for everyone.

By making a recurring donation or a one-time donation of any amount, you're helping to keep CP's articles free and accessible for everyone.

We’re sorry to hear that.

Hope you’ll give us another try and check out some other articles. Return to homepage.

Most Popular

More Articles