The Moral and Intellectual Bankruptcy of the Pro-Abortion Movement

By Michael Brown, Op-ed Contributor Thursday, August 08, 2013

In the wake of a rising tide of pro-life sentiments and sensibilities in America, the utter bankruptcy of the pro-abortion position is being revealed, especially in its more militant forms.

The pro-abortion side is now faced with:

The beautiful reality of 3D and 4D ultrasounds, making clear that the fetus in the womb is really a carefully formed, developing baby. It is now impossible to deny that the little one seen with such clarity on the screen is a human life that is about to be snuffed out.
The brutal reality of the houses of horrors run by men like Dr. Kermit Gosnell (and others), with the unavoidable conclusions that: 1) the same doctors who killed babies in the womb had no problem killing babies outside the womb; and 2) there is virtually no moral difference between killing a 20-week-old baby in the safety of its mother's womb and killing it seconds after it emerges from the womb.
Moving stories from abortion survivors like Gianna Jessen. They even have their own network called TheAbortionSurvivors.com.
A younger generation that values fairness, equality, and the rights of the victim. Although this is often more gut-level than rational (leading many young people to wrong side of the homosexuality debate), it also explains why so many are becoming pro-life.
Court rulings against Obamacare's pro-abortion mandates.
Undercover videos by Lila Rose and others, revealing the greed and heartlessness of abortion providers. What has the pro-abortion side offered in response?
Planned Parenthood dropping its "pro-choice" moniker, once considered an impregnable (no pun intended) winning concept, in favor of the hopelessly self-defeating, "Your Baby Will Thank You" (but only, of course, if the baby manages to escape the Planned Parenthood clinic alive).
Completely inane statements by the media, like this one, from MSNBC host Melissa Harris-Perry, who said: "When does life begin? I submit the answer depends an awful lot on the feeling of the parents. A powerful feeling -- but not science. The problem is that many of our policymakers want to base sweeping laws on those feelings." (Aside from the ludicrous nature of saying that the parents determine when life begins -- where does this kind of thinking lead? -- the question remains: Which lawmakers are trying to "base sweeping laws" on feelings alone?) Yes, this was the same TV host who recently wore tampon earrings to protest the Texas abortion laws.
Absolutely murderous statements by so-called medical ethicists, leading to outlandish headlines like this, in Britain's Telegraph: "Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say." (Yes, the headline really says, "experts say.") The article continues, "Parents should be allowed to have their newborn babies killed because they are 'morally irrelevant' and ending their lives is no different to abortion, a group of medical ethicists linked to Oxford University has argued."
Pathetic ads, like the one celebrating the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade and featuring black actor Mechad Brooks. The ad was so dreadful that Eric Metaxas commented, "When I first watched this ad, I thought, this HAS to be a spoof. It employs the ugly racial stereotype of a smooth-talking [black] predator celebrating his freedom to use women at zero cost to himself: Hey, baby, hook up with me -- and then go have an abortion. Are they kidding? No; this was no spoof."
Despicable protests in Austin, Texas, against legislators who were simply voting for a ban on abortions after 20 weeks as well as for heightened health regulations at abortion facilities. As Katie Pavlich reported, "Apparently chanting 'hail Satan,' 'f*ck the church,' 'bro-choice' and holding signs that say 'hoes before embryos' just wasn't enough for pro-abortion protestors in Texas. According to reports on the ground, police have confiscated bricks, tampons, pads and condoms protestors planned to throw at pro-life lawmakers." The police "also confiscated jars of urine and feces."
Students on campus videotaped as they signed a petition to legalize "aborting" fourth-trimester babies (meaning, already born, full-term babies -- but who said college students were good at math these days?).
The rise of the "bro-choice" movement, as young men, surely moved by altruism alone (forgive the sarcasm), are now taking a stand. As expressed by Ben Sherman, "For those of us guys who like girls -- you know, like them like them -- and want to have relationships with them, that may last anywhere from a few minutes to many years, we need to think about how this bill (Texas HB 2), by curtailing the bodily autonomy and sexual freedom of women, hurts us, too. We need to stand with women in their fight to control their own bodies."

It is little wonder, then, that the pro-life tide continues to rise.

Yet a recent Pew Research poll indicates that far less Americans think abortion is an important issue today as compared to just 7 years ago, with most Americans still opposed to the complete overturn of Roe v. Wade -– all of which means we have our work cut out for us. And so, rather than congratulating ourselves prematurely, we need to increase our efforts to expose the bankruptcy of the pro-abortion position and continue to emphasize the precious sanctity of life.

Michael Brown is the host of the nationally syndicated talk radio show The Line of Fire and is the president of FIRE School of Ministry. His newest book (September, 2015) is Outlasting the Gay Revolution: Where Homosexual Activism Is Really Going and How to Turn the Tide. Connect with him on Facebook at AskDrBrown or on Twitter at drmichaellbrown.