Recommended

CP VOICES

Engaging views and analysis from outside contributors on the issues affecting society and faith today.

CP VOICES do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author(s).

Can We Please Show Some Civility and Restraint in the Aftermath of the Annapolis Massacre?

Michael Brown holds a Ph.D. in Near Eastern Languages and Literatures from New York University and has served as a professor at a number of seminaries. He is the author of 25 books and hosts the nationally syndicated, daily talk radio show, the Line of Fire.
Michael Brown holds a Ph.D. in Near Eastern Languages and Literatures from New York University and has served as a professor at a number of seminaries. He is the author of 25 books and hosts the nationally syndicated, daily talk radio show, the Line of Fire.

From the bottom of my heart I'm making an appeal. To my fellow radio and TV commentators. To other journalists. To all of us posting on social media. Please. Can we show some restraint and demonstrate some civility in the aftermath of the latest mass shooting in our country?

This is not about Trump.

This is not about Democrats or Republicans.

Get Our Latest News for FREE

Subscribe to get daily/weekly email with the top stories (plus special offers!) from The Christian Post. Be the first to know.

This is not even about gun control.

This is about 5 people who went to work on Thursday never to return. It is about families in shock and agony and grief. It is about three others who were physically wounded and many others who will carry emotional wounds for years.

And, according to the latest reports, this was about one man with a personal vendetta against one newspaper company.

This was not about accusations of "fake news" or attacks on the alleged purveyors of "fake news."

According to what we know, this was about revenge. Murderous, bloody, heartless revenge. Why must we politicize this tragedy? Have we no shame?

A headline on the Huffington Post reads, "The Deadliest Day For U.S. Journalism Since 9/1. The grim milestone comes amid escalating hostility toward the press."

The article, by Nick Wing, stated, "Although we don't yet know if the gunman in Annapolis chose to target the Capital Gazette newsroom out of a broader animosity for the media, the killings come at a time of escalating antagonism toward the press, often at the urging of those in the highest ranks of power."

Remarkably, hours after the real motive of the shooting was revealed, the article and headline remained unchanged.

Another HuffPost headline declared, "'The Wire' Creator David Simon Eviscerates Marco Rubio After Newsroom Shooting. 'You've affirmed the notion that the press is an alien, untrustworthy cohort,' he said."

This headline and story also remained unchanged after more information about the shooting was released.

What kind of garbage is this? Senator Rubio's tweets, in fact, were reasonable, as he bemoaned the realities of our deeply divided media. He said, "BTW I'm not happy about this reality. It's terrible for country. Lack of trust in reporting leaves us vulnerable to conspiracy theories & unable to have debates b/c we can't even agree on baseline facts. We are all ALL to blame for this mess. Sorry, that includes many in media." (This was one of several tweets he posted.)

It is obscene that, after the shooting, David Simon tweeted, "From the vantage of someone who is waiting for the death count of journalists shot in their newsroom in my home state, can I simple say that @marcorubio is unfit to be a citizen of a republic, much less a legislator. You should crawl through broken glass to hell, Senator."

Talk about a rush to judgment. Talk about an embarrassing tweet. Shame on David Simon for connecting Rubio's reasonable tweets with the slaughter in Annapolis.

As the night wore on, Simon turned his wrath on Trump, with tweets like this: "My friends die today and you bring this? [He was responding to another tweet.] I expect little of a deranged man with a history of domestic abuse and irrationality [speaking of the killer]. I f---ing expect my president, the leader of a republic, to speak of a free press not as 'enemies of the people' as a provocation to such men."

We can understand the depth of his grief seeing that he lost personal friends. But he has no excuse for drawing a direct line between the shooting and the president.

Breitbart reports that, "Rob Cox, Global Editor for Thomson Reuters' Breakingviews vertical, said the Capital Gazette newspaper shooting was a direct response to President Donald Trump's criticism of the mainstream media.

"This is what happens when @realDonaldTrump calls journalists the enemy of the people. Blood is on your hands, Mr. President. Save your thoughts and prayers for your empty soul."

I'm sure he spoke for many who shared his sentiments and also raced ahead to an ugly, incorrect judgment.

To his credit, when the real story came out, he tweeted, "Fair enough to call me out for jumping to a conclusion about the motives here. Vilifying any category of people - journalists, migrants, conservatives, liberals etc - can incite violence. This one hits close to home. Genuinely saddened."

Sean Hannity was also involved in a controversy as the shooting was reported. During his live radio show, he said, "I've been saying now for days that something horrible was going to happen because of the rhetoric. Really, Maxine? You want people to create — 'call your friends, get in their faces' — and [former President Barack] Obama said that too. 'Get in their faces, call them out, call your friends, get protesters, follow them into restaurants and shopping malls,' and wherever else she said."

This led to headlines blaring, "Sean Hannity blames Maxine Waters and her 'horrible rhetoric' for the Maryland newsroom shooting as the Democrat congresswoman cancels events after a 'very serious DEATH threat' is made against her."

Hannity, for his part, shot back several hours, with his staff posting numerous clips from his show where he said he was not connecting Waters' rhetoric with the shooting. The headline on Hannity.com read, "LIBERAL LIES: The Hill, Media Matters, Daily Beast Lie About Hannity's Comments."

The article then states, "Sean Hannity never tied today's horrific shooting to the comments made by Representative Maxine Waters. Today's event was pure evil, and no one can control someone who is intent on inflicting pain and violence."

Listening to the relevant clip, you can argue that Hannity was using the occasion of the latest shooting, which to him was an example of how many sick, evil people out there, to ask Maxine Waters, "Do you realize why your words are so dangerous? There are crazy people out there, and your rhetoric could provoke them to do evil things."

But even putting the best construction on his radio segment (in light of his subsequent comments throughout the show), why bring up Maxine Waters in this context at all?

All of us who speak to hundreds or thousands or millions have an incredible privilege and an incredible responsibility. At a tragic time like this, when coldblooded murder hits us between the eyes, we have no excuse for irresponsible reporting. May all of us step higher. And may God have mercy on the grieving and the wounded.

Dr. Michael Brown (www.askdrbrown.org) is the host of the nationally syndicated Line of Fire radio program. His latest book is Saving a Sick America: A Prescription for Moral and Cultural Transformation. Connect with him on Facebook or Twitter.

Was this article helpful?

Help keep The Christian Post free for everyone.

By making a recurring donation or a one-time donation of any amount, you're helping to keep CP's articles free and accessible for everyone.

We’re sorry to hear that.

Hope you’ll give us another try and check out some other articles. Return to homepage.

Most Popular

More In Opinion